Sunday, December 9, 2007

A personal example

As an example of what I've been talking about: last week, I ran a 5k here in Boulder (the Colder Boulder, winter analogue of the Bolder Boulder, though much smaller). I'd had a pretty difficult week, between school and my personal life, and wasn't even sure I wanted to run. When the morning dawned, it was windy, far from ideal conditions. I decided I'd be happy if I finished.

I felt good, and decided to go for it. Figured given the weather conditions, breaking 20 would be a good accomplishment.

I ran through the first mile in 5:47, feeling good. The second mile turned uphill, into the wind, and passed much more slowly. I had trouble breathing, because the wind was robbing me of air every breath I took. But I managed to get through the two mile mare at 12 flat, and decided then that I could pull of a sub-19 that day, a post-surgery PR for me. Any way, as soon as I said that, my breathing eased up, my legs loosened up, and I crossed the line at 18:58. And you know what? I felt amazing.

The next day I went out and ran the same pace for four miles, as I mentioned in another post.

In any case, here's a pic of me on my way to that PSPR:

Saturday, December 8, 2007

Philosophical running

It was snowing this morning when I left to meet the BBTC group for our weekly long run. Fortunately, however, there had been little accumulation up till that point, so we could get our run in without worrying too much about injury.

Days like this are my favorites: temperature was about 25, a brisk but not annoying wind, snow falling steadily to heavily. I don't know what it is about the snow, but sometimes it makes me feel more like I'm flying than running. It seems as though, instead of moving, you are standing still, and the snow is flying towards you. The crunch of your footsteps on the frozen trail is the only sound in the world. It is one of my favorite experiences.

As usual for Saturday mornings, I ran with Jessica and Pete, leading to inevitable interesting conversations. I realized today just how much I enjoy running with the two of them, and with Jessica in particular. There was one point when, unintentionally, for about 5 minutes, none of us said anything, but our strides locked in step, so that instead of three footfalls each stride, it sounded as though there were only one person running. We kept up a healthy banter otherwise, and were remarkably casual about the run, stopping several times to decide which way we were going to head next. We reached a new level of camaraderie this morning, giving each other nicknames and just generally joking.

At one point, though, our conversation switched to a more philosophical note. I talked about the NYT article (see the previous post) and how important the mind is to running. From there, we moved on to the nature of reality, and our perception of reality. I mentioned my basic precept, my axiom as it were: "I am." Or "I exist." Going from there we discussed whether intelligence can in fact effect reality directly, without the intervening physical manifestation of a body movement or something similar. Can we, as humans, effect the reality around us purely by thinking? There is mounting evidence, some of a very scientific nature, some of pseudo-scientific, that suggests we can.

I personally am not sure. I'm a skeptical scientist by my nature, and I have trouble accepting that notion, but it does seem to be possible. What is certain, what we all agreed on, is that mental perception is very important. If you believe you can, or cannot, do something, it's very likely to be the case.

In that case, it's important, in athletics and in life as a whole, to cultivate a successful mindset. Or, to make a habit of success. "I can't" becomes an forbidden term, as far as achievement goes. Of course, this needs to be within reason, but a mindset of expecting to do well, expecting to run that PR, knowing you will run that PR, is critical in actually doing so.

Again: cultivate a successful mindset. Make success a habit.

Interesting Article

My mother sent me this article the other day, from the New York Times. I find it very interesting, and possibly useful. It's essentially on the power of the mind over the body, but there's far more to it than that.

December 6, 2007

Personal Best

I’m Not Really Running, I’m Not Really Running...

By GINA KOLATA

BILL MORGAN, an emeritus professor of kinesiology at the University of Wisconsin, likes to tell the story, which he swears is true, of an Ivy League pole vaulter who held the Division 1 record in the Eastern region.

His coaches and teammates, though, noticed that he could jump even higher. Every time he cleared the pole, he had about a foot to spare. But if they moved the bar up even an inch, the vaulter would hit it every time. One day, when the vaulter was not looking, his teammates raised the bar a good six inches. The man vaulted over it, again with a foot to spare.

When his teammates confessed, the pole vaulter could not believe it. But, Dr. Morgan added, “once he saw what he had done, he walked away from the jumping pit and never came back.”

After all, Dr. Morgan said, everyone would expect him to repeat that performance. And how could he?

The moral of the story? No matter how high you jump, how fast you run or swim, how powerfully you row, you can do better. But sometimes your mind gets in the way.

“All maximum performances are actually pseudo-maximum performances,” Dr. Morgan said. “You are always capable of doing more than you are doing.”

One of my running partners, Claire Brown, the executive director of Princeton in Latin America, a nonprofit group, calls it mind over mind-over-body.

She used that idea in June in the Black Bear triathlon in Lehighton, Pa., going all-out when she saw a competitor drawing close. She won her age group (30 to 34) for the half-Ironman distance, coming in fourth among the women.

When it was over, she ended up in a medical tent. “I felt like I was going to pass out or throw up or both,” she recalled. “At a certain point in a hard race, you’ve pushed yourself beyond the point of ignoring the physical pain, and now you have to tell your mind that it can keep going, too.”

The problem for many athletes is how to make a pseudo-maximum performance as close as possible to a maximum one. There are some tricks, exercise physiologists say, but also some risks.

The first thing to know, said Dr. Benjamin Levine, an exercise researcher and a cardiology professor at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, is that no one really knows what limits human performance. There’s the ability of the heart to pump blood to the muscles, there’s the ability of the muscles to contract and respond, there’s the question of muscle fuel, and then, of course, there is the mind.

“How does the brain interact with the skeletal muscles and the circulation?” Dr. Levine said. “How much of this is voluntary and how much is involuntary? We just don’t know.”

But since most people can do better, no matter how good their performance, the challenge is to find a safe way to push a little harder. Many ordinary athletes, as well as elites, use a technique known as dissociation.

Dr. Morgan, who tested the method in research studies, said he was inspired by a story, reported by an anthropologist that, he suspects, is apocryphal. It involves Tibetan monks who reportedly ran 300 miles in 30 hours, an average pace of six minutes a mile. Their mental trick was to fixate on a distant object, like a mountain peak, and put their breathing in synchrony with their locomotion. Every time a foot hit the ground they would also repeat a mantra.

So Dr. Morgan and his colleagues instructed runners to say “down” to themselves every time a foot went down. They were also to choose an object and stare at it while running on a treadmill and to breathe in sync with their steps. The result, Dr. Morgan said, was that the runners using the monks’ strategy had a statistically significant increase in endurance, doing much better than members of a control group who ran in their usual way.

That, in a sense, is the trick that Paula Radcliffe said she uses. Ms. Radcliffe, the winner of this year’s New York City Marathon, said in a recent interview that she counts her steps when she struggles in a race. “When I count to 100 three times, it’s a mile,” she said. “It helps me focus on the moment and not think about how many miles I have to go. I concentrate on breathing and striding, and I go within myself.”

Without realizing what I was doing, I dissociated a few months ago, in the middle of a long, fast bike ride. I’d become so tired that I could not hold the pace going up hills. Then I hit upon a method — I focused only on the seat of the rider in front of me and did not look at the hill or what was to come. And I concentrated on my cadence, counting pedal strokes, thinking of nothing else. It worked. Now I know why.

Dr. Morgan, who has worked with hundreds of subelite marathon runners, said every one had a dissociation strategy. One wrote letters in his mind to everyone he knew. Another stared at his shadow. But, Dr. Morgan asked him, what if the sun is in front of you? Then, the man said, he focused on someone else’s shadow. But what if the sun goes behind a cloud, Dr. Morgan asked?

“Then it’s tough,” the runner conceded.

Dissociation clearly works, Dr. Morgan said, but athletes who use it also take a chance on serious injury if they trick themselves into ignoring excruciating pain. There is, of course, a fine line between too much pain and too little for maximum performance.

“The old adage, no pain no gain comes into play here,” Dr. Morgan said. “In point of fact, maximum performance is associated with pain.”

The brain affects everyday training as well, researchers note.

Imagine you are out running on a wet, windy, cold Sunday morning, said Dr. Timothy Noakes, an exercise physiologist at the University of Cape Town. “The conscious brain says, ‘You know that coffee shop on the corner. That’s where you really should be.’” And suddenly, you feel tired, it’s time to stop.

“There is some fatigue in muscle, I’m not suggesting muscles don’t get fatigued,” Dr. Noakes said. “I’m suggesting that the brain can make the muscles work harder if it wanted to.”

Part of a winning strategy is to avoid giving in to lowered expectations, athletes and researchers say. One friend tells me that toward the end of a marathon he tries not to look at people collapsed or limping at the side of the road. If he does, he suddenly realizes how tired he is and just gives up.

Marian Westley, a 35-year-old oceanographer in Princeton, N.J., and another running friend of mine, used several mental strategies in the recent Philadelphia marathon.

She slowed herself down at the start by telling herself repeatedly that she was storing energy in the bank. And when she tired near the race’s finish, she concentrated on pumping her arms. “I thought about letting my arms run the race for me, taking the pressure off my legs.”

She finished in three hours and 43 minutes, meeting her goal of qualifying for the Boston Marathon. “I am over the moon!” she wrote in an e-mail message the day after the race.

Wildlife and Fartleks

Yes, a strange title for the post this time. On Wednesday, the day following the famed hill workout, I went out for a 40 minute easy run, and I actually took it easy for once. I probably didn't run much more than 8 minute mile pace, and at some points slower than that. That was good, since my legs felt better after running than they did beforehand. In any case, about ten minutes into the run, I saw a flash of red in front of me. A fox had just run across the path in front of me. 20 seconds further on, another flash, and another fox. At about the halfway point, I saw some people stopped and looking up at the side of the foothills, which were looming as ever to the west. Stopping to see what they were looking at, I saw a huge herd of deer. By my count, there were 13: 12 does and fauns and one very successful buck. I'd not seen a herd of that size within Boulder before. Deer are a common sight here, but that many in one group impressed me. On they way back, I saw two hawks circling far above, and the two foxes once again crossed my path. It dawned on me how much I love this place.

Yesterday, which would be Friday, I woke up to slushy snow falling outside my window. Since I didn't have class till one, I opted to run in the morning. It was a fartlek workout. Fartlek means "speedplay" roughly in Swedish. I included a description below, courtesy of Ian Kemp. It is possibly my favorite type of workout. All the reasons I love it are included below. In any case, 5 minutes into the warmup, I realized, running through the falling snow with my shoes squelching each step, that there was nowhere I'd rather be and nothing I'd rather be doing at that time. That is a wonderful feeling, and I don't think most people experience it often enough. I count myself rich because I experience that regularly on my runs.

As I promised: the definition of a Fartlek. Of course, I prefer the Trail Running magazine definition: going for a run after eating beans.


What is Fartlek?

by: Ian Kemp

Fartlek is a form of road running or cross country running in which the runner, usually solo, varies the pace significantly during the run. It is usually regarded as an advanced training technique, for the experienced runner who has been using interval training to develop speed and to raise the anaerobic threshold. However, the 'average' runner can also benefit from a simplified form of Fartlek training, to develop self-awareness and to introduce variety into the training program.


For the advanced runner, the aim in Fartlek can be best decribed by relating it to interval training. The purpose of interval training is to develop speed by running for short distances at a speed significantly higher than the normal strong race pace, with these short runs separated by intervals of easy running or jogging. Intervals are normally run over predetermined distances, and usually on the track.

Fartlek is similar to interval training in that short fast runs alternate with slow running or jogging recovery intervals. However, in Fartlek the running is done on the road or on parkland or bush tracks. There is no predetermined schedule to follow, but instead the athlete will set her/his own interval lengths and pace in response to their own feeling of the workload. An advantage of Fartlek is that the athlete can concentrate on feeling the pace and their physical response to it, thereby developing self awareness and pace judgement skills. Also the athlete is free to experiment with pace and endurance, and to experience changes of pace.

It is primarily a technique for advanced runners because it requires 'honesty' to put in a demanding workload, and also 'maturity' to not overdo the pace or length of the intervals. With these qualities, Fartlek makes for an excellent component of a distance runners training programme.

A 'mild' form of Fartlek can also be of benefit for the 'average runner'. Here I am thinking of the road runner who normally trains over a variety of distance, at a fairly constant pace, and who may have done no or little specific speed training.

The technique here is to introduce into your normal runs some short periods of slightly higher pace. Maintain these for a short period, say 200-400m (aim for a bend in the road, power pole or some other landmark up ahead). Then drop your pace back below your normal running pace, or slow to a jog, until you have fully recovered and your breathing has returned to normal. Then return to running at your normal pace, and put in another slightly fast interval later in the run. In this way you are putting a slight extra stress on your system which will, in time, lead to an improvement in your speed and in your anaerobic threshold.

You can use this approach to develop more self-awareness, by concentrating on what you are feeling while running at the different paces. How fast a pace can you attain before your regular, easy breathing begins to be laboured? After slowing down, how long before your breathing & other responses return to normal? What happens to your stride length as you increase speed?

Give it a try next time you run, and if you enjoy it, then you have discovered the true meaning of Fartlek, without resorting to a dictionary..!

Ian Kemp, Cool Running Australia, 22.06.97


Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Breakthrough

So despite the hard workout and race the previous two days, my workout yesterday went quite well. I ended up running my coach ragged, which was unexpected. But at least I gave him a workout for once. 8x2min hills is a pretty tough workout for anybody, actually. I almost always feel like I'm about to puke by the end of it.

I was debating whether to even go last night. Here in Boulder, we had somewhere around 15-25MPH sustained winds with gusts up to 50+MPH. It literally threw you off balance when it gusted. The way we arranged the hills was a little odd, too. We ran with the wind up the hill . . . The wind pushed you straight into the hill rather than up it, but despite that, whenever a particularly impressive gust of wind caught you, you were suddenly moving faster than your legs would normally be carrying you. It was unnerving, actually.

The most difficult part, though, was that since you were running into the wind during your rest, you still had to work (even going downhill) just to keep moving forward. Wind that speed does the opposite of robbing you of breath: it forces air into your lungs. So during the workout, we never really got the chance to catch our breath.

Needless to say, I"m sore today. I don't think my arms have ever been this sore from a pure running workout. And I currently have difficulty walking up stairs on campus. Gotta love it!

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Not tired enough

My legs are nowhere near tired enough after the race Sunday. While that makes sense because of the wind, they should be more tired than they are. I ran 4 miles yesterday in 24:34, which is about 6:08 miles. That's almost exactly the pace I ran on Sunday for the 5k. This also suggests that I'm peaking, and need to find a race to honestly peak for next weekend. It would be a shame to waste this.

On another note, I had another friend suggest I try to get sponsored yesterday. The first time someone told me that, I dismissed it. The second time, the person suggesting it was a pro mountain biker, and I took her a little more seriously. The third time, I can't really ignore it. Apparently, most sponsors are really looking for somebody who will show their product and label off often (ie who will run a lot of races) and I think I qualify on that point at the moment. As one friend put it, I "run like it's [my] job."

Sadly it's too late to do anything about it this year, but come next year I might look into it if I'm still running as much as I am currently.

Meanwhile, I got 18th or 19th out of 940 people Sunday. I'll take that, especially knowing I can run faster than I did.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

About time

I had a good race today. Conditions were far from ideal, with maybe 10MPH sustained wind plus significant gusts. The way the course was set, the wind was into your face on the uphills, which made it that much more difficult. But I succeeded in breaking 19 minutes (by a few seconds). I also beat my roommate, and came in a little before the first woman (I edged her out in the last 50 meters).

The best part of the race, though, was my fan section. The course was such that people could see me at several different places on the course. The race was set up as an invite, based on your Bolder Boulder time from this spring. However, since I didn't run the Bolder Boulder, I was in the open race, and all of my running friends had finished the race already. Some of them stuck around for more than two hours after their race just to see me run. At one point on the course I had no fewer than 8 people yelling my name. I haven't had that since College, and it made a huge difference to me.

So thank you Jessica, Mark, Jeff, Rick, and the rest of you. I hope you noticed the surge of energy I got up that hill after passing you.